Boots has replaced Marks & Spencer at the top of a ranking of brands among women.
The pharmacy chain climbed from third place in last year’s YouGov BrandIndex’s Women’s Rankings despite sparking controversy when saying it would not lower the price of its generic brand of emergency hormonal contraception as it did not want to be accused of “incentivising inappropriate use” – a decision it later reversed.
John Lewis took second place in the rankings, followed by Heinz, while M&S dropped to fourth place, one place ahead of BBC One.
The rankings use YouGov’s brand tracking data and are based upon whether a respondent has a positive or negative impression of a brand.
Although Boots achieved the highest score overall, M&S took the top position among those aged between 35 and 49 and the over 50s.
Swedish furniture giant Ikea is the most popular among those aged between 18 and 34.
Amelia Brophy, UK head of data products at YouGov, said: “Despite a tough time for high street retailers, Boots has cemented itself as a force among female shoppers.
“Women’s impression of the brand has improved in the face of some negative press around its morning after pill pricing, which threatened to damage its reputation.”
She added: “M&S remains a well-regarded brand, despite its drop from the top spot. As we’d expect, it is particularly popular among middle-aged and older women.
“It has enacted various strategies to appeal to younger consumers, and that still remains a challenge.”
The rankings also reveal which brands have seen the biggest increase in impression among women over the past year, with Netflix taking the most-improved spot with a score increase of 7.3 points.
McDonald’s achieved the second most-improved place with a score increase of 6.8 points, followed by discount retailer B&M bargains, Comparethemarket.com and Tesco.
:: YouGov interviews 2,000 women per day, with fieldwork undertaken between March 1 2017 to February 28.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here