UPDATE: Seattle Public Schools shuffling teachers after enrollment surprise

8:35 PM: When Seattle Public Schools took an enrollment count after classes started for the year, district managers discovered more than 700 fewer students districtwide than they had planned for. So the district has announced that they’re shuffling teachers. After principals got the word from HQ, they shared the news with staff and students’ families. We’ve received a copy of the letter sent to families at one affected local school, Arbor Heights Elementary, thanks to an AHES parent. Principal Christy Collins wrote:

I need to let you know about a new situation that we have been made aware of that affects our school.

While our enrollment at Arbor Heights has grown significantly since last fall, it has not grown as much as the school district projected that it would in June. Because of this fact, we were notified last night that we will have to move forward this year with one less teacher.

To help you understand how these situations come about at this time of year, I think it would be helpful to share a little more about how state and school district funding for teachers works. The winter before a given school year, the district projects how many students our school will have in each grade level and then, tells us how many teachers they expect us to have based on that enrollment projection. The state, however, only gives funding for teachers in the district based on the number of students that show up at our school that fall and that is the amount of funding that the district has for teachers at each school. That timing and process is what causes changes with teachers and classrooms in the fall to happen more often than we all would hope.

Last fall our fall enrollment for grades K-5 was 521 students. This past February when schools are told their projected budgets, our enrollment for this year was projected by the school district to be 543 students for grades K-5. This enrollment projection along with state funding for smaller class sizes for grades K-3 resulted in a projected increase of 2 classroom teachers.

Then in June, the school district increased the K-5 enrollment that they were projecting for Arbor Heights to 588 students. At the time, Seattle Public Schools increased our FTE by 2.5 additional teaching positions. Again, although we have grown significantly since last fall, our current enrollment of 552 students is less than the 588 projection. 552 does not include our 40 preschool students. Before hiring for these additional positions that were given in June, I double and triple-checked with the district to ensure these projections were accurate, but eventually, we moved forward with the hiring of teachers to ensure we found excellent candidates to fill the openings.

I hope this additional information helps you to better understand how these situations come about in schools at this time of year, I know that it does not remove the significant disruption that these changes can cause for our community. We will do everything we can to minimize this disruption and support students, families, and teachers through this process. While we have learned that we must reduce our staffing by one teacher, we are required to work through our school decision-making process to determine the specific changes that will happen here at Arbor Heights to accommodate that reduction. As soon as those specific changes have been determined, we will share the next steps with our families.

According to Melissa Westbrook, who has long reported SPS news via saveseattleschools.blogspot.com, the list of other schools affected includes six schools in West Seattle. She reports that along with AHES, Genesee Hill Elementary and Louisa Boren STEM K-8 will each lose a teacher, while Gatewood and Lafayette Elementaries will each gain a teacher, as will Chief Sealth International High School. (We haven’t seen what those schools have sent to families – anyone who would consider forwarding us a copy, editor@westseattleblog.com – thank you.)

P.S. If you have questions/comments about this or any other Seattle Public Schools issue, tomorrow is the first community conversation of the year with our area’s elected School Board rep (and its president) Leslie Harris, a drop-in event from 3-5 pm Saturday at Southwest Library (9010 35th SW).

6:30 AM: Thanks to the person who sent the district-wide memo that was circulated to principals (PDF) with the school-by-school specifics. They include some corrections to what we noted above: Lafayette is adding 1.5 teachers; Genesee Hill is losing 1.5; Boren STEM is losing .5. District-wide, 12 positions are being added, 33 reduced. The memo says, “The district is committed to retaining staff. All displaced individuals will be assigned to a position in their category. If a suitable vacancy is not found, teachers will be assigned as building designated substitutes until a position becomes available.”

22 Replies to "UPDATE: Seattle Public Schools shuffling teachers after enrollment surprise"

  • Mike L. September 21, 2018 (8:59 pm)

    Translation: we are not permitted to exceed the starvation-level funding of the district in any way so you’re fired. 

    • GOP in WS September 22, 2018 (11:48 am)

      Teachers and school staff received a nice pay raise this school year. Budget breaker

      • umm September 22, 2018 (1:10 pm)

        So you…  Ummm…  You think teachers are well-paid?  Care to elaborat—ah, nvm.  I don’t think I wanna hear it.

        • Former Seattle Teacher October 5, 2018 (11:09 pm)

          You can view teacher salaries on line. SO MANY are around $90,000. I was one of them. Hardly starvation level.
          The average school district in the US spends close to 90 percent of their budget on salaries and benefits.

  • SPSBites September 21, 2018 (9:08 pm)

    Ugh. Leaving SPS next year because if crap like this! no wonder enrollment  is down! They can’t get it together even with all the shuffling new board etc. 

    • Pam September 23, 2018 (9:36 pm)

      It’s true. I have one kid left in SPS (Genesee Hill) but he’ll be going to a charter school after Genesee Hill (and GH has been amazing). My oldest is being incredibly well educated at a Highline school and my middle is being incredibly well educated at a charter school.  The kicker – I tried and tried to tell them that one of my kids wasn’t coming this fall and they couldn’t seem to get it right at an enrollment level. SO, some of their surprise is their own fault!

  • Lisa September 21, 2018 (9:39 pm)

    This doesn’t sound like “shuffling” teachers. It sounds like letting them go and “shuffling” students, whose classes will be broken up and assigned to other teachers.

    • WSB September 21, 2018 (11:15 pm)

      I say shuffling because the district seems to be clearly saying that no one is losing their jobs – they are moving teachers from one school to another.

  • Mike September 21, 2018 (9:42 pm)

    Ughhh, Genesee is over capacity and classes are huge.  How does cutting a teacher help?  Cut SPS district useless top staff, no pay until they do something worth a dime.

  • Erika Jackman September 21, 2018 (10:01 pm)

    I am the parent of a very happy 2nd grader as well as a very happy Kindergartner at Arbor Heights Elementary School.  I was so saddened by the news that a teacher will be cut and many classes will be reorganized as a result.3 years ago, Gatewood Elementary raised the $90,000 to keep the teacher on staff and not disrupt the students.  They did this with a gofundme and a bake sale.  If the parents and community started a similar campaign and were able to raise the money, would the school board allow the teacher to stay so that the students of all classes could continue in the classrooms they began in?  Here is the info on the Gatewood fundraiser:https://westseattleblog.com/2014/10/followup-friends-of-gatewood-continue-fundraising-to-keep-a-teacher/I will be at the meeting tomorrow to try and figure out a solution to this.  This is an awful thing for the community and the children in these schools.Hope to see my fellow community parents and leaders tomorrow at the SW library.

    • Teacher and Arbor Heights Parent September 22, 2018 (1:43 am)

      It’s so tempting for parents to come in and try to rescue the situation by funding a teacher. I understand the sentiment. My son’s classes have been shuffled around every year at the beginning of the year due to the opposite problem of needing  to add another teacher. It’s tough for the kids and teachers because they just get settled in and then they have to get bounced around. However, the legislature is constitutionally required to fully fund education. When parents rush in and pay for a teacher, they free up the state from fulfilling it’s duty. It’s hard to make the argument to the state that their fix for the McCleary decision is working when parents pay for teachers. When the state changed the funding model for schools, urban districts like Seattle made temporary gains, but lost the ability to raise as much levy money starting next year. That means cuts to staff could get worse next fall. Funding of teacher positions should not fall on PTAs or be a solution at all. Put pressure on the district to look at it fixing its projection model and the state to change the funding model so schools aren’t put in this position. If it is not fixed the cuts next year are going to be way worse once the levy limits set in.

      • SPS Parent September 22, 2018 (8:23 am)

        It’s also incredibly inequitiable. 

      • AH/Denny/Sealth Parent September 22, 2018 (9:15 am)

        Yes, put the pressure on the district!  Leslie Harris, our school board rep., has a community meeting today from 3:00-5:00@ SW Branch Library.   In terms of the PTA funding teachers, this also creates an equity problem as Title 1 schools have such a difficult time raising a substantial amount of money compared to other schools.

  • Highline Teacher September 21, 2018 (10:40 pm)

    Interesting… Highline School District also has a 700 student enrollment deficit from its projections, losing $3.5 million in state funding and reducing staff by 15 FTEs.  But the reason given is due to higher cost of living in the region.

  • Insider September 21, 2018 (11:12 pm)

    @ Mike L. -This is NOT at all related to pay increases. Displacement is not fired. Displacement is reassignment. This is normal every year Oct 1 count allocations. It happens every year gain or lose a staff member in your school. It is not specific to only Seattle. This is a state funding allocation and numbers game.  Yes, everyone should be annoyed and enrollment changes should change staffing the first week of school not later. 

  • Heidi A September 21, 2018 (11:32 pm)

    Louisa Boren STEM L-8 is an option School. The district controls how many are enrolled and the school has a long wait list. To say that “projections” are causing a loss of staff is suspect, if not an out right lie. 

  • WS parent September 22, 2018 (7:20 am)

    I think it is interesting that a district admin employee gave up the actual document explaining the whole process to them. I agree with the person that said admin at the district level should be cut. They do not directly impact kids. 

  • Azimuth September 22, 2018 (8:31 am)

    Serious question here: how does 0.5 teacher work?

    • Erika September 22, 2018 (12:03 pm)

      Half time employee.

  • TJ September 22, 2018 (3:06 pm)

    SPS just gave a hefty raise to teachers clearly knowing it is a short term fix and not sustainable past this year. All based off of a ridiculous hope that they can pity taxpayers into pressuring the state to all our levy level to continue at its current rate, and in actuality probably trying to raise it. When McCleary was deemed satisfied, the state had fulfilled its “paramount duty”. With that came local levy reductions to offset our huge tax increase. Sorry, giving money the district knows it will not have is a joke. The state will not allow local levies to stay. This is zero hour in the fight to cut the distric management and divert that money to teachers to support this raise. Otherwise, next school year it will be ugly here, either with teacher layoffs, or pay decreases. This is not a fight for taxpayers to fix

    • flimflam September 22, 2018 (8:48 pm)

      well said, thank you!

  • 1994 September 22, 2018 (10:12 pm)

    Maybe SPS management needs to more closely review the work of the person or persons doing these projections or forecasts. This is not the first time things have been seriously out of whack. 

Sorry, comment time is over.