ACLU sues Boston police for use of force, surveillance docs
The ACLU says the Boston Police Department has a “longstanding pattern of delay” that violates the law.
Related Links
-
Racial Justice
The Mass. House passed a police reform bill. But the ACLU says it ‘misses the mark.’
-
OPERATION CLEAN SWEEP
Report: Lawyers say Boston police video from ‘Operation Clean Sweep’ shows unconstitutional stops
-
POLICE REFORM
A civilian review board to investigate complaints against Boston police is on the table for the City Council
BOSTON (AP) — The American Civil Liberties Union has sued the Boston Police Department for withholding records related to recent Black Lives Matter demonstrations and other policing issues.
The civil rights group’s Massachusetts chapter said Wednesday that it has filed nine public records requests with the department in the last year-and-a-half that are all “well past-due.”
Among the things the ACLU has requested are use of force records from June’s anti-racism demonstrations as well as from the controversial “Straight Pride Parade” in 2019.
It has also requested information about the department’s use of teargas and pepper spray going back to 2016, the location of surveillance cameras in Boston, and any communications between city officials and federal immigration enforcement agencies.
Matthew Segal, the organization’s legal director, said release of the information has taken on “new urgency” amid nationwide calls for police reform.
“Transparency is at the heart of accountability,” he said in a statement. “The public has the right to know what the police are doing in their name and with their tax dollars.”
Massachusetts law requires public agencies respond to records requests within 10 business days, but the ACLU says Boston police have a “longstanding pattern of delay” that violates the law.
A police department spokesperson declined to comment Thursday, citing the pending litigation.
Get Boston.com's browser alerts:
Enable breaking news notifications straight to your internet browser.
Conversation
This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on Boston.com