Skip to content

Breaking News

Connecticut GOP tries to harness toll opposition for fundraising

A toll opponents hold a sign at a rally for the anti-toll movement at the state Capitol on Saturday.
Kenneth R. Gosselin / Hartford Courant
A toll opponents hold a sign at a rally for the anti-toll movement at the state Capitol on Saturday.
Author

The threat of highway tolls is now a fundraising vehicle for Republicans in Connecticut.

In a fundraising letter Tuesday, state GOP Chairman J.R. Romano wrote that tolls would place another burden on the state’s already over-taxed residents and businesses — and if they want to stop it, they should give money to the party.

The two-page appeal opens by referring to the governor as “New Tax Ned” Lamont, who it says “lied” during last year’s gubernatorial race about only supporting tolls on out-of-state trucks. Lamont, a Democrat, has since said that the only way to raise enough money for overdue transportation improvements is to toll all vehicles on 91, 84, 95 and Route 15.

Romano’s letter says Connecticut Republicans need to raise $40,000 over the next 21 days and asks supporters to chip-in $500, $250 or $100.

“Acting like arrogant kings and queens in a monarchy, the regal Connecticut Democrats love to tell you what to do and take your money and make it their money,” the letter reads.

Lamont senior adviser Colleen Flanagan Johnson said the only transportation funding alternative offered by Republicans, a plan known as Prioritize Progress, would take on long-term debt for the state and runs counter to the “debt diet” plan of the governor.

“This is desperate, misleading and, quite frankly, sad,” Flanagan Johnson said. “Instead of exploiting the state’s crumbling infrastructure for campaign contributions, we suggest donations to offset the $65 billion loan the Republicans want to saddle the tax payers with to pay for it.”

Romano said Democrats are creating a false narrative that they have sworn-off bonding. He pointed out the state, under Lamont’s Democratic predecessor, Dannel P. Malloy, and Democratic majorities in the legislature, has bonded for discretionary projects such as playground splash pads.

“I think it’s disingenuous for the Democrats to pretend there’s no bonding going on,” Romano said. “Bridges and roads is actually what bonding is supposed to be for.”

Drivers with Connecticut-issued E-ZPass transponders would pay an average of 4.4 cents per mile during off-peak travel periods, which DOT officials have said is a 30 percent discount off the 6.3-cent-per-mile price for out-of-state vehicles. The rates would go up 25 percent during rush hour as part of a congestion mitigation plan proposed by the DOT. Drivers who make more than 20 round trips per month would get an additional 20 percent discount.

Lamont’s administration projects that tolls will generate $800 million a year for transportation improvements, including $320 million paid by out-of-state drivers.

“The Republicans continue to offer no solutions, but stand on the sidelines mocking elected officials who are showing leadership in trying to solve Connecticut’s problems,” said Jacqueline Kozin, executive director of the Connecticut Democrats. “Ned Lamont was elected governor last November and he’s doing his job; maybe the Republicans should focus on creative solutions and not schoolyard taunts.”

A number of cities and towns have adopted anti-tolling resolutions that are mostly symbolic in nature, but are intended to put pressure on lawmakers to reject Lamont’s plan.

Toll foes have further organized protests across the state, but have struggled to draw large crowds. A rally at the Capitol last Saturday drew an estimated 125 people. There is another one scheduled for May 18 at the Capitol that’s being organized by NoTollsCT.org, which has said it has collected more than 95,000 signatures as part of a petition drive against tolls.

“If Democrats want to pretend that people are not passionate about this, please do,” Romano said.

Neil Vigdor can be reached at nvigdor@courant.com

Stay up to date on Connecticut politics. Subscribe to the Capitol Watch newsletter here