Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
primary school in Midlands
A crumbling school in the Midlands: ‘Education is not a legacy that can wait for later’. Photograph: David Sillitoe/The Guardian
A crumbling school in the Midlands: ‘Education is not a legacy that can wait for later’. Photograph: David Sillitoe/The Guardian

While the UK government runs down schools, other countries pour money into theirs

This article is more than 5 years old
Laura McInerney

China has committed £22bn to education technology research; Britain has given less than £1m

Growing up in northern England I learned that while politicians will always do stupid things, you can’t let it get you down. Sure, the government might be ready to walk the country off a cliff – like they did to my little industrial hometown in the 1980s – but it’s only when they affect your hope, as well as the economy, that you’re truly sunk.

Somewhere in the middle of last week, after the spring statement, my hope finally slid away. The chancellor’s continued silence on school spending was deafening. “We are waiting for the autumn spending review,” say Conservative insiders, who seem not to understand that some schools are so squeezed they are seeking to close on Friday afternoons, or that council budgets are so shredded that special needs places are in crisis. Things are so bad that desperate local authorities are cutting back in ways that are barely legal. Last year, more than 2,000 families fought the lack of services for their child through the courts – and 90% won.

Why are England's schools at breaking point? – video

Across the education landscape there are all manner of logjams, not only financial ones but difficulties with inspection and academy takeovers – largely owing to poorly thought-through rules, mostly rushed in by Michael Gove. These can’t now be overturned or tweaked because parliament is spending all its time confabulating over Brexit. Sovereignty might be a noble cause, but it’s worth remembering that a major reason Britain was so late in providing mass secondary education, compared to other developed nations, was precisely because politicians in the late 1800s spent so much time faffing over issues of empire that they had no energy left to worry about something as mundane as the nation’s children. Why worry about chimney-sweeping kids when there are continents to civilise?

The working-class communities who, we are told, voted for Brexit because they felt left behind won’t feel any better, whatever happens at the end of March, when the legacy greeting them is crumbling schools and a four-day school week.

Furthermore, if we swallow the idea that walking out of Europe means we are entering a global economy race, then we need to be matching others in the fight who are pumping cash into developing a well-educated population. China has committed $30bn (£22.6bn) to education technology research over a four-year period to 2020. We have given less than £1m over three years.

The Middle East countries are pouring cash into their schools, which are sucking in British-trained teachers at a rate of knots. Even during a recent visit to St Vincent, a small island in the Caribbean, I had my ear chewed by a bus driver who was evangelical about the resources its government was putting into sending young people to top universities around the world. He could name every campus they were at, and sparkled with pride.

Education is not a public service that can wait for later. Every month money isn’t provided, every week schools close on a Friday, every day a child sits at home waiting for a place in a special school, is time we can never get back. Which is why I beg Theresa May to find a way to guarantee time for new education legislation in the next parliamentary year, and accept the call for a decent 10-year funding plan for education. Brexit matters, but so do children: they are our best hope for tomorrow.

Most viewed

Most viewed