Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Ian Paisley
Ian Paisley has been suspended from the House of Commons for 30 days. Photograph: PA
Ian Paisley has been suspended from the House of Commons for 30 days. Photograph: PA

DUP's Ian Paisley faces recall from parliament

This article is more than 5 years old

Petition aims to oust MP who failed to register hospitality from Sri Lankan government

The Democratic Unionist party MP Ian Paisley is facing the first parliamentary recall petition since legislation was introduced to allow voters to oust misbehaving politicians.

Paisley was suspended from the House of Commons for 30 days after acting as a “paid advocate” for Sri Lanka and lobbying on its behalf, while failing to register that the country’s government had paid for his family to go on holiday twice.

This triggered the recall procedure, and should 10% of the electorate, or 7,543 people, sign a petition over the next six weeks, then a byelection will be held in North Antrim.

Paisley said he had already apologised for his “unintentional failure” to register the hospitality, which he estimated was worth £50,000.

He succeeded his father as MP for the constituency in 2010 and has said he would stand in a byelection if one is called. Given that his majority is more than 20,000, some might consider it unlikely that he would lose any subsequent byelection.

A report by the Commons standards committee found Paisley’s actions “were of a nature to bring the House of Commons into disrepute”, after it emerged that he had breached the rules on paid advocacy.

After he received the holidays from Sri Lanka’s government, he wrote to David Cameron on 19 March 2014 to lobby against supporting a UN resolution on human rights abuses there.

He also breached rules by failing to declare the personal benefit in his letter to the prime minister, and on the register of interests.

Under the 2015 Recall of MPs Act, which came into effect in 2016, MPs who are convicted of a criminal offence and jailed, barred from the Commons for 10 sitting days or convicted of providing false information on allowance claims can lose their seat if there is a successful petition to recall them.

Last week, the Sinn Féin Northern Ireland assembly member Philip McGuigan said he had written to the electoral office to demand it puts in place the maximum number of voting centres and introduces more flexible voting times.

“The decision by the electoral office to locate petitions in only three locations in a large rural constituency like North Antrim is extremely disappointing and greatly reduces people’s ability to reject Ian Paisley’s disgraceful behaviour,” he said.

“Some people will have to travel up to 20-25 miles to vote in one of these three centres, and those who work outside of the constituency won’t have time to vote outside of working hours.”

McGuigan said the number of voting centres for the Paisley petition was significantly lower than for the 2017 general election, when there were 94 ballot across 49 locations.

He said some people would feel uncomfortable signing the petition at the Ballymoney centre in County Antrim because of the area’s strong unionist influence.

More on this story

More on this story

  • DUP mulls ending of power-sharing boycott in Northern Ireland

  • DUP making ‘progress’ in post-Brexit trade talks, says Donaldson

  • DUP urged to restore power sharing in Northern Ireland after Sinn Féin poll triumph

  • Bertie Ahern warns against revisiting Good Friday agreement now

  • No 10 gives DUP legal ‘assurances’ that Northern Ireland will remain in UK

  • Funeral of DUP’s Christopher Stalford attended by all main parties

  • DUP may walk out of Stormont power-sharing over Brexit protocol

  • New DUP leader targets end to Northern Ireland protocol

  • Sir Jeffrey Donaldson endorsed to lead DUP after majority vote

Most viewed

Most viewed