Bhopal gas tragedy: SC to hear in April Centre’s plea for enhanced compensation

Centre has demanded more compensation for the victims

January 28, 2019 12:56 pm | Updated 10:46 pm IST - New Delhi

Seeking justice: Survivors of the Bhopal gas tragedy taking part in a protest rally in Bhopal, in this file photo.

Seeking justice: Survivors of the Bhopal gas tragedy taking part in a protest rally in Bhopal, in this file photo.

The Supreme Court on Monday decided to examine in April a curative petition by the government for more compensation to the victims of the Bhopal gas tragedy, over and above the $470 million paid by Union Carbide.

The petition, which came up before a Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, said the compensation, determined in 1989, was based on the assumptions of truth unrelated to realities.

In 2011, the Supreme Court issued notice to the Union Carbide Corporation, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Dow Chemicals Co., U.S.; Dow Chemicals; McLeod Russel India, Kolkata; and Eveready Industries, Kolkata.

₹7,400 crore

The Centre had sought reconsideration of the May 4, 1989 and October 3, 1991 orders of the court, contending that the 1989 settlement was seriously impaired. It has sought ₹7,400 crore in additional funds from the pesticide company.

The tragedy unfolded in Bhopal on the intervening night of December 2-3, 1984, when the highly dangerous and toxic gas, Methyl Isocyanate, escaped from the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL). It resulted in the death of 5,295 humans and injuries to 5,68,292 persons, besides a loss of livestock and property of 5,478 persons.

The court has already dismissed a curative petition filed by the CBI in 2010 for increasing the punishment.

‘Colossal failure’

The agency had wanted to correct the Supreme Court’s “colossal failure of justice” in 1996 when it chose to dismiss the gas leak as the result of an act of negligence, and not culpable homicide, by former Union Carbide chairman Warren Anderson and his Indian employees. Mr. Anderson died in 2014. Dismissing the curative plea in 2011, the court held that “no satisfactory explanation has been given to file such curative petitions after about 14 years from the 1996 judgment.”

As a Bhopal court order sentencing Union Carbide executives to two years in jail sparked public outcry, the CBI moved the Supreme Court and wanted it to “restore” the criminal charge under Section 304 Part II of the IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) against the accused. Those convicted included former Union Carbide India chairman Keshub Mahindra.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.